Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 56(9): 1029-33; discussion 1033-4, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9734763

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study compared single maxillary surgery and a two-jaw procedure in patients who underwent one-piece Le Fort I advancement without bone grafting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients had Le Fort I osteotomy performed using a standard technique. Twenty-two patients had maxillary surgery alone, and 31 patients additionally had a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed. Both rigid and nonrigid fixation were used. The postoperative movement of the maxilla was investigated, comparing cephalograms taken preoperatively, 2 to 3 days postoperatively, and at least 6 months postoperatively. A computer program was used to superimpose the three radiographs. RESULTS: No difference in postoperative stability was found when the two surgical procedures were compared, and no correlation between magnitude of advancement and degree of relapse could be identified (P > .05). Nonrigid fixation in patients receiving only maxillary surgery resulted in greater postoperative forward movement of the maxilla (P = .022). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that postoperative stability of the maxilla in a two-jaw procedure is equivalent to that of single maxillary surgery. Nonrigid fixation in single maxillary surgery reduces the need for postoperative orthodontics.


Assuntos
Maxila/cirurgia , Osteotomia de Le Fort/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Cefalometria , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas de Fixação da Arcada Osseodentária , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...